CREATION OR EVOLUTION?
LEARN THE FACTS FOR YOURSELF!
SEE THE MOST RECENT "PROOF" FOR INTELLIGENT DESIGN" IN THE VIDEO BELOW! Scientists have now PROVEN that "evolution" could NOT have been the cause of our existence; once again, proving that The Bible Had It Right All Along!!! Also see side story to the right of video and there's even more on this at the bottom of the page! Don't miss the book either! "SIGNATURE IN THE CELL - DNA AND THE EVIDENCE FOR INTELLIGENT DESIGN"!
This is a highly recommended documentary to watch because it lays out in great detail the differences between Evolution & Creation in a very professional and thorough manner along with alot of those Irrefutable Facts I mentioned above!
Evolution??? REALLY??? What do the scientific facts say? Find Out Here For Yourself!!!
The Genesis Debate - Part 7
FREE Pamphlet: "What Darwin Couldn't Know" Click on the Image below to download or read your copy today for more fascinating facts!
SIGN THIS PETITION Saying "NO" to the Proposed Darwin Day and receive a FREE E-BOOK for your time called "Refuting Evolution"!
"Ben Stein Vs. Richard Dawkins"
CSEtv LIVE: Seminars and Debates Shown 24/7
IMPORTANT MESSAGE FOR
- Free Downloads
- 'Evolution Cruncher' PDF e-Book This is the original edition of this book-- for the updated edition see "Evolution Handbook" on this site (not in PDF)
- 'Science vs Evolution' Download each Chapter
- The Wonders of Nature -1 PDF e-Book
- The Wonders of Nature -2 PDF e-Book
- Q-E-D or New Light on the Doctrine of Creation George McCready Price 1917
- Predicament of Evolution George McCready Price 1925
- Creation Speaks Harold W. Clark 1947
- Come Visit Our Virtual Classrooms! (CLICK HIGHLIGHTED LINK)
"EVOLUTIONARY ASSUMPTIONS ARE NOT SCIENCE?"
Many college science professors never tell their students that the evolutionary model of one cell to man is based on assumptions.
An assumption is something taken for granted and supposed to be true. Christians believe that God created the universe and everything in it, even though they can’t prove it with scientific experiments, so this belief is called an assumption.
Evolutionists likewise have assumptions. They take many necessary steps for granted in the molecules-to-man model. In other words, evolutionists assume that non-living chemicals gave rise to that first living cell which, in turn, mindlessly and randomly evolved into ever and ever more complex forms of life. But there are NO scientific experiments to prove the molecules-to-man scenario! It is not scientifically testable or experimentally verifiable or reproducible or able to be authenticated in any way!
There are seven basic assumptions that are often not mentioned during discussions of evolution. Many evolutionists ignore the first six assumptions and only consider the seventh. The assumptions are: that non-living things gave rise to living material, i.e., spontaneous generation; that spontaneous generation occurred only once; that viruses bacteria, plants and animals are all related; that protozoa (single-celled life forms) gave rise to metazoan (multiple-celled life forms); that various invertebrate phyla are interrelated; that the invertebrates gave rise to the vertebrates; and that within the vertebrates the fish gave rise to amphibian, the amphibian to reptiles, and the reptiles to birds and mammals.
These assumptions are the whole of evolutionary teaching. In other words, there is no factual (experimentally testable and reproducible) science that supports evolution! The process of moving from non-living things to the first living, reproducing cell to man and giant redwood trees is all an assumption.
…SO NOW YOU KNOW!
Incredible Creatures That Defy Evolution I
Backwardly wired retina “an optimal structure”:
New eye discovery further demolishes Dawkins
Dawkins’ latest book The Greatest Show on Earth purports to provide the proof of evolution. One of his favourite "proofs" for years is the ‘backwardly wired’ retina, allegedly a mistake that no designer would make. But our new book The Greatest Hoax on Earth? shows why this is necessary–indeed, long ago, creationist ophthalmologist (eye-disease specialist) George Marshall said of Dawkins, “The idea that the eye is wired backward comes from a lack of knowledge of eye function and anatomy.”
A new discovery further vindicates Greatest Hoax? since eye-scientists from Israel conclude from their recent cutting-edge research, “The retina is revealed as an optimal structure designed for improving the sharpness of images.” That is, the arrangement that has so long been mocked by Dawkins turns out to be superior–the researchers even think it could help design better cameras.
See this update article by Greatest Hoax author Dr Jonathan Sarfati.
If we are to believe the Theory of Evolution; once upon a time, we looked something like these pictures! But are there ANY "FACTS" to back this theory up? Find out for yourself here! Dr. Thomas Kindell examines and powerfully refutes the so-called “evidence” that man evolved from an ape-like ancestor.
This video file is a 60 minute seminar by Thomas Kindell that was recorded during the Seattle Creation Conference August 2007. Weigh the evidence for yourself. CLICK HERE OR ON THE TITLE TO WATCH THIS SEMINAR THAT PRESENTS THE EVIDENCE.
A Compelling Case for Intelligent Design Based on Revolutionary Discoveries in Science In "Signature in the Cell," Stephen Meyer has written the first comprehensive DNA-based argument for intelligent design. As he tells the story of successive attempts to unravel a mystery that Charles Darwin did not address--how did life begin?--Meyer develops the case for this often-misunderstood theory using the same scientific method that Darwin himself pioneered. Offering a fresh perspective on one of the enduring mysteries of modern biology, Meyer convincingly reveals that the argument for intelligent design is not based on ignorance or "giving up on science," but instead on compelling, and mounting, scientific evidence.
Offering a fresh perspective on one of the enduring mysteries of modern biology, Meyer convincingly reveals that the argument for intelligent design is not based on ignorance or "giving up on science," but instead on compelling, and mounting, scientific evidence.
See story at the bottom of the page for "Signature In The Cell - DNA And The Evidence For Intelligent Design" for more information on this amazing new discovery!
"Signature In The Cell: DNA And The Evidence For Intelligent Design"
Several scientists are now agreeing that it takes more faith to believe in evolution than it does to believe in a creator.
They say new discoveries inside the very building blocks of life are giving more evidence all the time that there's an intelligent design behind all life on earth.
Darwin's theory of evolution rests on the idea that the incredibly complex web of life today all evolved from simple chemicals and cells. No creator was necessary, just chance and the powers of the fittest forms of life to survive and adapt.
But Darwin couldn't see into cells and DNA like scientists of the modern age. He couldn't know these building blocks of life work because of intricate little machines in each cell -- so wildly intricate there's no chance they could simply evolve.
Click here to view an animated illustration of how the human cell works. This site also has some amazing video and audio presentations too! You can also purchase Mr. Meyer's new book "SIGNATURE IN THE CELL - DNA AND THE EVIDENCE FOR INTELLIGENT DESIGN" to learn everything about this amazing discovery!!!
Darwin couldn't know that DNA functions -- life itself functions -- because of incredibly complex code, way beyond what even the most brilliant computer programmers have devised.
Secular scientists often mock the simple faith of those who believe in an unseen God. But statisticians say the odds are impossible that this incredibly intricate, elegant code could ever just evolve.
Because of that, they say it takes much more faith to believe in such chance than it does to believe an intelligent designer is behind this code at the core of all life.
Science philosopher Stephen Meyer, in his book Signature in the Cell, lays out the evidence for such intelligent design. He refutes the arguments that the theory of intelligent design is just religion and not true science. It's a battle over the very origin and meaning of life that the secular media rarely allow to break out into the open.
WATCH ANOTHER INTERVIEW WITH STEPHEN C. MEYER HERE!
Also watch below:
Debate With Peter Ward at Talk of the Times (TVW)
Video from TVW
The rematch, a debate with Meyer and Ward addressing each other’s arguments for intelligent design and evolution (or not, respectively). Reporters and columnists especially should listen to this, as a real debate by scientists on the science of Darwinian evolution is almost as rare as life in the universe.
Click On Picture Below To Go To The Site To Buy "SIGNATURE IN THE CELL - DNA AND THE EVIDENCE FOR INTELLIGENT DESIGN"!!!
Audio Podcast of Interview with William Dembski's Advise For Young Intelligent Design Scientists
GREAT BOOK Available For A FREE Digital Download when you sign up to receive news from Discovery Institute! Just click on the picture of the book to the left!
Published in 2009, Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design is recognized as establishing one of the strongest pillars underlying the argument for intelligent design. To call the book fascinating and important is an understatement. No less interesting in its way, however, was the critical response and it is with that this book is concerned. For the fact is that despite SITC being written about in print and online by numerous friends and foes of intelligent-design theory, few—if any—of the critics really grappled with the substance of Meyer’s argument. This is remarkable and telling. In this digital book which includes live links to the critics’ own writings, defenders of SITC analyze the hostile response.
Complexity and the Case for Intelligent Design
In and of itself, complexity doesn’t make the case for intelligent design. It’s true that complex systems aren’t necessarily designed, but if the complexity displays order and organization (as is the case for bacteria), then it points to the work of a Mind.
The growing recognition of bacterial complexity also has implications for the origin-of-life question. Increasingly, the evidence suggests that bacteria display an inherent minimal complexity required for them to even exist. Any chemical ensemble less complex than this minimum complexity cannot be considered “alive.”
The ever-increasing recognition that life’s minimum complexity is more sophisticated than thought makes it harder and harder to think that life could have emerged through chemical evolution. These new advances have left the evolutionary explanation for life’s origin buried in the sand.
"A Special Creation - Video Series"
The world is growing crazy and getting more so by the minute. Crime rates have skyrocketed and moral filth is on the rise. Even though this is something we're all quite aware of, what most of us do not realize is that the cause of this destructive behavior stems from evolutionary teachings! You see, what a person believes determines how they behave. So if we teach our kids that they supposedly came from an ape, then why are we surprised when they act like apes? Therefore, the below video series "A Special Creation" takes a look at not only the Scriptural facts, but the hardcore facts of science, reason, and logic to dispel this lie that we evolved from the goo, to the zoo, to me and you! You will explore such lies as: The Lie of the Ape Man Evolution, the Lie of the Horse and Whale evolution, the Lie of
Natural Selection, the Lie of Embryology, the Lie of Mutations and Vestigial Organs, and finally the Lie of Transitional Fossils and Punctuated Equilibrium. "A Special Creation" clearly reveals that a Special God created us for a special purpose; to enjoy a special relationship with Him. But not only that, you will actually hear direct quotes from the evolutionists themselves saying that yes, we very well could have A Special Creation! After watching this series, you too will come to the same conclusion as Dr. T. N. Tahmisian who stated, "Scientists that go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever. In explaining evolution, we do not have one iota of a fact."